Weblog
Tuesday, 24 November 2009
-
St. Augustine: A Thanksgiving Reminder
Thanksgiving is time to stop and remember all the good things in life. The idea of giving "thanks" demands that there is someone from whom these goods things have come. You can't thank anyone for the good if they didn't give it to you. As a Christian, I believe all good things come from God's grace. And God's grace falls on both the righteous and unrighteous. So, as we think upon the things for which we are thankful, let us remember who to thank.
I find a few words from St. Augustine helpful here:"If the things of this world delight you, praise God for them but turn your love away from them and give it to their Maker, so that in the things that please you you may not displease him."
"Praise God from whom all blessings flow!"
"The good things which you love are all from God, but they are good and sweet only as long as they are used to do his will. They will rightly turn bitter if God is spurned and the things that come from him are wrongly loved."
(Confessions, book IV, chapter 12)
Happy Thanksgiving!
::Esteban::
Sunday, 22 November 2009
-
We Need Doctrine
In preparing for sermon on John 15:1-17, where Jesus states, "I am the vine, you are the branches," I came across a wonderful paragraph from the always well-written magazine Modern Reformation. The article, written by Michael Horton, talks about the rise of the interest and centrality of "discipleship" among younger Christians. I include myself in that group. In fact, we have changed "Sunday school" to be "discipleship classes" at the church I pastor.
Yet, as a Reformed theologian, Horton reminds us of the need for doctrine. Though I typically end up on the Anabaptist side of the conversation, I deeply appreciate the reminders from Reformed brothers and sisters. Here's the paragraph worth reading:We need sound doctrine, not because we are intellectualists but because we need the surprising good news that we have been saved not by our discipleship but by Christ and his work. We need this doctrine not simply to know how to be saved from God's wrath but for the knowledge of how we have been liberated from the tyranny of sin. Anyone can rise to the occasion and help to make the world a better place, but only through faith in Christ can a sinner be united to Christ and bear the fruit of the Spirit, whose fragrance penetrates this passing age with the scent of the age to come. We need the doctrine in order to know what God is doing in this time between Christ's two comings, as he gathers us to receive his good gifts through preaching and Sacrament, as we respond to him in prayer and praise, contribute to the up-building of the saints through the gifts he has given us, and reach out to the world through witness and service. (Read full article here.)
- What is the role of doctrine for Christians?
- Do you think your church over-emphasizes it or under-emphasizes it?
- Which doctrines are essential?
::Esteban::
Wednesday, 18 November 2009
-
The Reasons for Things, If They Exist
After an unwanted and stressful encounter, a friend finally regained composure and expressed a sense of acceptance saying, "Well, I guess everything happens for a reason."
That was the second time I'd heard that phrase this week. So this time I asked, "For what reason?"
He struggled to accept the validity question. For to say, "Everything happens for a reason," is supposed to be the period, the final punctuation, on a typically bad situation. When we can finally say this, we have reached the point of maturity, it is assumed. Nothing more can be known until the future unfolds and we can look back with 20/20 vision.
Certainly, it is good to "accept the things we cannot change," as the serenity prayer guides us, but that's different than saying the thing we cannot change (a part of "everything") has a purpose. Our future actions beyond the thing that just happened for a reason are dependent upon what we believe that reason is.
Ultimately, I find it uninteresting and unhelpful to stop at the statement, "Everything happens for a reason." It is much more revealing (and fun) to discuss what that reason/purpose might be. For example, my friend tried to explain to me that I met my fiancée so that we'd get married. Feeling ornery, I annoyingly said, "No, we did not meet to get married. We met because one day I want to own goat and she'll be the one to own it with me. We have not reached our fate until that comes to pass. Marriage is simply a way to keep her around until then."
What we believe the purpose of a thing is will guide our future actions beyond that thing. If we believe the car crash happened so that we could learn to rely on God more, then we'll attempt to rely on God more. If we believe the car crash happened so that we could get a new car, then we'll get a new car. If we believe the car crash happened so that we'd be forced to a see and doctor and find out we have cancer, then the purpose has already been accomplished.
And this may be exactly why we don't ask the follow up question too often. It is impossible for us to know the exact purpose of each thing that happens in life, if there even is one. Virtue, in this case, is simply trusting that something out there has something good in mind.
I respond in an ornery way to this phrase, in fact, not because I don't believe we can't know the intended purpose of things, but because I simply don't believe "everything" has an intended purpose. I believe crap happens. I don't believe God operates in Scripture according to the ethical stance of "the ends justify the means." "This this bad thing happened so that I could learn ______."
Instead, I believe we can learn from everything, but I can't believe that our learning (or whatever outcome their might be) was the purpose of the event in the first place. I believe that God makes good come from bad, through his grace, but not that the bad was put in place so that good could be learned.
What do you think? Does everything happen for a reason? Do you use this phrase? If so, what types of reasons are worth considering?
::Esteban::
Friday, 13 November 2009
-
Why I Waited to Say, "I Love You"
This past Saturday when I proposed to my girlfriend, not only did our relationship move from “dating” to “engaged,” but also from “I like you” to “I love you.” I had decided to wait to say, “I love you,” until I proposed, because I wanted her to know that when I say, “I love you,” I’m making a promise, not just expressing a flood of warm feelings I’m hoping she’ll share. I wanted my saying it to be different from how it is usually said in our society.
Too many times when we say, “I love you,” we are speaking from our insecurities. We say it waiting for the other person to say it back. It’s a life-line we throw out hoping the person will reel us in. If s/he says it back, we feel safe. If not, we feel lost, alone, or empty. In this fashion, “I love you” becomes more of an emotional weapon and can cause us to act from our insecurities. We need a little pick-me-up so we want our significant other to say "I love you." If s/he doesn't say it, then we remain down. Over time, this is a huge strain on any relationship, it becomes a battle.
I wanted my fiancée to know that when I say, “I love you,” she doesn’t need to respond. At least, that’s not why I’m saying it. It’s a promise I’m making to her. “I promise to love you.” My “yes” will be “yes.” I promise to be patient and kind, not to be envious, boastful, or proud. I promise not to be rude, self-seeking, or easily angered. I will keep no record of wrongs. I promise to protect you and trust you, always hoping and persevering.
::Esteban::
Tuesday, 10 November 2009
-
The first "I love you"
I met my fiancée when a friend and I crashed a house party for one of those emergent-type, hip churches in LA. She was the hostess. She caught my attention when we started talking about education, health-care, and politics. Hip churches can actually talk about these things, I suppose. Anyway, I was determined to get her number before I left, so I stayed and offered to help clean her dishes. That worked! We've been dating for a little over 13 months now.
This past weekend, I took her down to wine country to propose. She had no clue. We did a tasting at a particular winery we enjoyed last time we went down there. After the tasting, we walked through their front lawn. She didn't know that I had arranged a private lunch in their gazebo. In fact, she was thinking that we shouldn't be there. That's when I told her the table was for us. I thought she would have noticed the Perrier bottle-turned-vase (her favorite vase).
It was there, in the middle of wine country, under the blue sky, and just before taking a knee to ask her to marry me, I told her for the first time, "I love you."
"I love you, too," she happily responded. When I bent to one knee and proposed, she took her time (what she is calling, "taking in the moment," and what felt more like an eternity), then said, "yes."
Since this all happened this past weekend, I'm still glowing. She's also still glowing, and has new hobby: staring at her ring. It's nice that all of our family and friends are 100% behind us. Not a single person is opposed. There's no drama, just excitement. I couldn't have asked for anything better.
::Esteban::
Wednesday, 04 November 2009
-
FOX: Creating the News (Daily Show clip)
I hesitated to put this up, but I can't help but share it. How does a comedy show expose the antics of the news networks so frequently? Watch this at least up to minute 9:45 as Jon Stewart reveals how FOX gets its news (from itself). Sometimes Jon Stewart really is simply better journalism than the 24-hour news networks. This segment reveals how FOX doesn't think its viewership is intelligent.The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c For Fox Sake! www.thedailyshow.com Daily Show
Full EpisodesPolitical Humor Health Care Crisis
Tuesday, 03 November 2009
-
Martin Luther: A Nimble Bull in Heat
Written by Joel, my best friend and second-favorite theologian
Paul Ramsey once described the way a Christian handles himself in politics as analogous to how “porcupines make love… carefully.” True to his conviction, Ramsey wrote with a nuanced poignancy, carefully weighing and prudently selecting every word. Martin Luther, on the other hand, brought a different style to political discourse. Luther’s prose is bold and hyperbolic; he makes wide sweeps in as brass of means as possible. His theological works are more comparable to a bull in heat than a porcupine making love. This style of Luther’s leaves him very susceptible to criticism from the modern readers who often value a more sensitive approach to theological and ethical discourses.
Though Luther’s words are bullish in establishing his arguments, his arguments themselves are nimble. To appreciate the often overlooked nimbleness of Luther’s prose, a deeper analysis is needed, an analysis concerning the nature of the “harmony” articulated in Luther’s claim: “In this way the two propositions (non-resistance and responsibility of protecting the neighbor) are brought into harmony with one another.” Luther’s “harmony” enables the Christian to serve his neighbor through government in a limiting framework.
Luther’s writing is nimble. He balances the Christian’s willingness to serve with his willingness to suffer. Luther is too shrewd of a thinker to provide a paradigm that would allow a Christian to conform to an unbelieving world through unmitigated devotion to Caesar, which is often a gross misreading of Luther. Therefore, the Christian willingness to suffer which underlines Luther’s harmony often places the Christian at odds with the powers that be.
When Luther's bull comes out dancing with statements such as, “If you see that there is a lack of hangmen, constables, judges, lords, or princes, and you find that you are qualified, you should offer your services and seek the position,” and, “It is both Christian and an act of love to kill the enemy without hesitation, to plunder and burn and injure him by every method of warfare,” it may seem absurd to propose that the bull is careful not destroy the china shop. Even in these words, Luther provides a highly nuanced and limited account of how a Christian can interact with the governing authorities. Yet the failure to see Luther as offering a vision that limits Christian participation in the politics of power is to completely miss that Luther understands his very act of writing Temporal Authority: To What Extent it Should be Obeyed as an act of civil disobedience in and of itself:I can and will no longer just look at my ungracious lords and angry nobles; I shall have to resist them, at least with words. And since I have not been in terror of their idol, the pope, who threatens to deprive me of soul and of heaven, I must show that I am not in terror of his lackeys and bullies who threaten to deprive me of body and of earth.
The boldness that offends our sensibilities and leads to modern dismissals of Luther’s writings is the same boldness that demands the modern reader give a closer read.
Ironically, Luther’s boldness provides his ethics both nuance and backbone. Luther’s poignancy is only revealed in a holistic reading of Luther that juxtaposes his boldness in declaring the legitimacy of government with his equally bold realism concerning the "rascality" of governing authorities, the necessity of suffering when government oversteps its bounds, and the bold refusal to negotiate Christian identity with the powers-that-be.
Though much of Luther’s critique against government occurs when government meddles with articles of faith, it is important to note his paradigm’s effective witness when government commits political vice. This is seen poignantly when a Christian must refuse to participate in a war, rather than enter a fray simply to acquiesce to a Caesar’s whims. “Question: What if a prince is in the wrong [when entering a war]? Are his people duty bound to follow him then too?Answer: No, for its no one’s duty to do wrong.” The agenda for Luther’s paradigm is not how a Christian balances his identity between being a Christian and a citizen of the state. The paradigm of harmony simply addresses the question of how one is to be a Christian; it is the internal claims in Christianity that must be negotiated, because Christians have no interest in compromising their particular identity by negotiating with secular identities.
Luther provides a paradigm of thought that establishes harmony between Christ’s non-resistance and interest in the neighbor’s well-being in a violent world. The language he employs is appropriately bold for the realities to which he speaks. These words of “harmony,” which balance suffering and service, can only be appropriated by those who have accepted the necessity of losing their lives in order to commune with Christ and his world through suffering.
Monday, 02 November 2009
-
All Saints' Day: A Sermon
A Sermon for All Saints' Day based on John 11:14-54.
“If you have ever lost someone very important to you, then you already know how it feels, and if you haven’t, you cannot possibly imagine it.” This quote is from the opening paragraph of the first book of A Series of Unfortunate Events. The author, who writes dark tales for children under the pen name “Lemony Snicket,” explains that this is how the Baudelaire children felt when they became the Baudelaire orphans after both their parents died in a house fire.
Those words of how difficult it is to convey a sense of loss fit with today’s reading. Martha is hurt when she sees Jesus. She says, “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died.” A little bit later she called for her sister Mary who repeated that same accusation, “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died.”
God is often accused for being too late.
Then Gospel of John tells us in verse 33, “When Jesus saw [Mary] weeping, and the Jews who came with her also weeping, he was greatly disturbed in spirit and deeply moved. He said, ‘Where have you laid him?’ They said to him, ‘Lord, come and see.’”
Then we are told in that shortest of verses that “Jesus wept.”
God, the Great Unmovable, the Great Constant, is moved. Jesus loved Lazarus. He weeps at the grave of his friend. Yes, this makes sense in Jesus’ humanity, but if anyone believed in the resurrection, it should have been Jesus. Why would a person who believes in the resurrection and the glory of the life to come, let alone God himself, weep? How can God, who promises to one day wipe away all tears, weep over this man, Lazarus?
Grief is not unchristian. It is a sorrow that does not go away. Grief stays with you. In fact, not only can we NOT expect grief to go away completely, we also shouldn’t want it to. For as the person you loved is not returned to you, how can you stop grieving? The loss remains, and so does the sorrow.
Do you remember Job? Job was the man in the Old Testament who never cursed God even though he lost all he owned and lost all his family, including his wife and children. When Job’s life struggles ended, God gave him a new family and a new life. But do you think that Job never grieved over the loss of his first wife or of his children?
Grief stays with us, yet it can and does change. And so we pray not for an end to the grief, but for the unbearable sense of loss to be replaced by a sorrow we can bear. We pray that in our grief we can start to pick our heads up and learn from the lives of those who have walked with us and before us.
Just as Christ wept at the grave of the friend he loved, we too weep over the graves of those we love. And it’s not only that we miss them, it’s also that we don’t want them to be forgotten. We don’t want their names to be erased from the face of this earth. So, in a sense, we find ourselves living for them. We live trying to make sure they are not forgotten. We live to make sure that what they lived for is not forgotten.
And so on this day we call All Saints Day, we take time not only to remember those whom we loved, but also those in our Christian ancestry. Without the Spirit’s work in their lives, we may have never heard the message of God’s good news through Christ Jesus. In fact, after the sermon, Pastor James and Lydia will come forward and sing us an absolutely beautiful song about remembering. After they sing, I will invite you to come forward to light a candle for a person who has died recently. That’s what these candles are for.
I would like to share with you about two people, in particular.
As we gather in this sanctuary, I’m reminded of a man who I wish I could have known. Ray C. was once an elder of this church. He died last year. Ray was a friend to many of you and many others who used to fill this church.
Ray had a full life. He wasn’t always a believer, but when he finally came to see the promises of God in Christ, he devoted all of him to the Lord’s service. I’ve been told he was creative and artistic. In fact, he designed the stained glass windows here in our sanctuary. These stained glasses remind us of Ray. And as we look at Ray’s life and work, we are reminded of Jesus.
And that’s how it goes. That’s how it should work. That when we pass, we somehow leave behind not only a legacy of who we were, but a reminder of who God is in Christ.
And so it also is with the life of a 2nd century martyr named Justin.
Justin was a philosopher. One day an old man started talking to him about philosophical issues and then told him about Jesus. Through this conversation, Justin became interested in knowing more. So he started learning about the Hebrew prophets from the Old Testament, who lived before the philosophers Justin had studied. He said the prophets spoke “as reliable witnesses of the truth.” They prophesied of the coming of Christ, and their prophecies were fulfilled in Jesus.
Justin said that afterward “my spirit was immediately set on fire, and an affection for the prophets, and for those who are friends of Christ, took hold of me; while pondering on his words, I discovered that his was the only sure and useful philosophy. . . . it is my wish that everyone would be of the same sentiments as I, and never spurn the Savior's words." Justin sought out Christians who taught him history and Christian doctrine, and then "devoted himself wholly to the spread and vindication of the Christian religion."
Justin continued to wear the cloak which identified him as a philosopher, and he taught students in Ephesus and later in Rome. An historian notes that "he engaged in debates and disputations with non-Christians of all varieties, pagans, Jews, and heretics."
Justin's conviction of the truth of Christ was so complete, that he died a martyr's death somewhere around 165 A.D. Justin was beheaded along with six of his students.[1]
There were tears upon hearing of the death of Ray C. There were tears shed for Justin, his students, and several thousand early church martyrs. There were tears at the grave of Lazarus.
Yet these deaths had more in common than tears. These deaths were the deaths of those who were friends of Christ Jesus. And the promise which Jesus made at the grave of Lazarus is a promise that can be made at the grave of every friend of Jesus.
Jesus said, “I am the resurrection and the life. Those who believe in me, even though they die, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die.”
Then he asks, “Do you believe?” Ray believed, Justin Martyr believed, Lazarus believed.
For those of you who believe, this is the promise we base our lives upon. And if you haven’t yet come to know Jesus, the question still remains, “Will you believe?”
You see, God has invited everyone to return to Him, trusting in His promises. It may seem that God is delayed, but surely God will deliver.
The words from Lemony Snicket are true: “If you have ever lost someone very important to you, then you already know how it feels, and if you haven’t, you cannot possibly imagine it.”
So, yes, we grieve, we cry, we mourn the loss of our loved ones. But we may become a people who can also say with Paul, “Death has been swallowed up in victory." "Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting?" The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. But thanks be to God! He gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.
To rearrange the words of Lemony Snicket, I believe what’s also true is that “If you have ever known the love of Christ, then you already know how it feels, and if you haven’t, you cannot possibly imagine it.”
May the lives of those we remember, help us to trust all the more deeply in the promises of Christ Jesus.
[1] http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/justin.html
Saturday, 31 October 2009
-
Unsolicitied Opinions
We are a part of a society that likes to talk, talk, talk –- unceasingly expressing unsolicited opinions. We put our opinions out into the world as if the world depends on them, as if people desperately need to hear from us.
I'm more and more convinced that we talk so much because we hope to be noticed and to see if people will like us. We speak from our insecurities. We hope our unsolicited opinions will be received with praise and acclamation. “How wise you are!” If our opinions are rejected, no worry, we just call everyone who rejected us ignorant. Instead of considering the validity of our opinions we simply forge ahead without modification, judging others for not being as intelligent as us.
This is a problem. In a society of talking heads on TV and blogs like this one all over the Internet, we rarely take time to listen. We are so busy talking that we rarely slow down enough to seek wisdom.
I’ve been reminded by one of TheGreatBout's recent posts, which lists many poignant words from the book of Proverbs, to seek God’s wisdom –- to keep my mouth shut longer, my ears open longer, and my temper under control. Check out the verses of wisdom and may they find their way into the core of who you are. May you allow the Spirit to work within you to bear the fruit of wisdom, all for the glory of God in Christ.
::Esteban::
Thursday, 29 October 2009
-
Your Favorite Xanga Posts (and Discussions)
I was just reading an older post from someone on Xanga I recently found. I was very interested in the discussion that ensued from the post. It made me realize that there are so many great conversations happening here that get lost (or are never found by most).
Have you been a part of some really good discussions on certain posts? What are they? What are some of your favorite or most memorable discussions on Xanga? Drop us the link.
::Esteban::
- browse entries:
- older »
Pulse
-
"I have torn myself free from all our ambitions and have decided to serve God. If you will not follow my lead, do not stand in my way."
-
I write out my sermons word-for-word. Tomorrow, I'm trying an outline. Scary. Too big of a responsibility to say things incorrectly.
-
Today, I'm a turkey delivery man.
Recommended
-
weblog entry from revelife@revelife
-
weblog entry from revelife@revelife
-
weblog entry from SirNickDon
-
weblog entry from SirNickDon
- browse recs:
- next »

soy_esteban
